Sign up or login now! You'll be able to join in the conversations, earn Kudos, and have fun in your city!

Is there anything more repulsive in London at the moment than Louise shitting Redknapp?

FoolFighter

Posted by FoolFighter about 1 year ago
Last active about 1 year ago 31 responses

I just saw her this morning for the first time, driving to work, on some huge billboard near Aldgate I think, and seriously, I nearly crashed my car. Not because my mouth fell open in some priapic, lusting drool-frenzy, but because my mouth fell open as my breakfast tried to propel itself out of my body and onto my lap, perhaps in order to breathe some life into my curdling genitool.

If you haven’t seen her, have a look at her website:

http://www.louise-redknapp.co.uk/

She’s advertising Triumph knick-knacks, but for some reason they’ve made her look like some rat-faced, perma-titted, shit-eating wag-mong. So horribly fake, and intensely ugly in the face. Like a cross between Muriel Grey and Jordan. Why? WHY? Didn’t she used to be fit, when she was just Louise? What the hell happened to her? She looks like a large plastic rodent now, full of condensed milk. I despair, I really do. What’s wrong with the world? eh?

Atom feed | Digg this | Newsvine

31 responses

robram

I think it’s a severe case of the Photoshops…

Posted about 1 year ago by robram

Flashboy

I can’t help feeling your reaction is veering tentatively towards the extreme.

Posted about 1 year ago by Flashboy

comradem

Where did stuff like this end up before the internet?

Posted about 1 year ago by comradem

digo

i feel like quoting thom yorke:

you used to be alright what happened? thanks for whatever…

Posted about 1 year ago by digo

BeavisSchmeavis

Have you read some of the dememented comments from men on her site? Sad. Oh so very sad. And yes, I agree. Much plastic rat-age.

Posted about 1 year ago by BeavisSchmeavis

eviltwin

She drives to work on a huge billboard?

Posted about 1 year ago by eviltwin

Flange1971

Nice bra and pants though right?

Posted about 1 year ago by Flange1971

SFULGpremium

She’s smartened herself up a bit since I went out with her

Posted about 1 year ago by SFULG

CarmenMpremium

Foolfighter, if you don’t like what she’s showing you, can’t you just avert your eyes in a gentlemanly fashion?

Posted about 1 year ago by CarmenM

iSleepDiagonal

Why not join the forum on Louise’s website and let them know your feelings?

Posted about 1 year ago by iSleepDiagonal

middleofnowhere

The picture on the website is just a very very bad photo, there aren’t many people whose best angle is “looking straight up the nose”. Also the photoshopping to make her skin look plastic aren’t helping.

Posted about 1 year ago by middleofnowhere

pottytimepremium

I was very worried when I first read this rant because I thought it was from Uncle George and I was worried that he’d forgotten to take his pills or that he might apoplex himself to death. Then I saw it was from FF, that well known thefter or other people’s avatars and so I shall now sue him for all the grief and personal anguish he has caused me.

As for Redknapp, she looks like three or four different women sown together. Each of the bits looks very well fashioned, and you can’t see the stitches, and I have to agree with MON that the photographer has not chosen the most effective poses for her face. The only thing I can think is that she’s either got lots of double chins or she has one of those saggy necks that can only be hidden by posing like there’s shit on your upper lip.

Posted about 1 year ago by pottytime

comradem

Seriously, I thought the same, FF should get banged up for avatar theft, if not for protection (his own or Louise’s).

Posted about 1 year ago by comradem

mafalda_quino

Carmen M:

How the fuckity fuck could FoolFighter’s “rant” in any way be translated as misogynistic?

If anything, he expressed his preference to the natural Louise Redknapp, not the photoshopped “great big titties, drawn on pecs” model!

Seriously! Harumph!

Posted about 1 year ago by mafalda_quino

pottytimepremium

Ooh! Do I detect a flounce coming on?

BTW It’s preference for not ‘to’...

Posted about 1 year ago by pottytime

CarmenMpremium

The comment was mine to make, so whether you agree or not bears no relevance.

I would far rather wait for FoolFighter to return and speak for himself than have you outlandishly swearing at me in his defence.

Posted about 1 year ago by CarmenM

SFULGpremium

Good answer.

Although having said that, I do also think that FF was berating her apparent airbrushed/cosmetically-enhanced new look rather than being misogynistic.

Well, FF? Hmmm?

Posted about 1 year ago by SFULG

Babb

BTW It’s preference for not ‘to’…

You seriously need to get over this obsession with picking people up on their grammar, PT.

Posted about 1 year ago by Babb

MarkE

Yeah, I’m getting bored of it

Posted about 1 year ago by MarkE

Mockernee

Blame her husband. She’s probably been road-testing every fake tan, botox and nip-tuck product available for his style mag Icon, aimed at top-flight footy players and their fame-hungry spouses. She’s always looked a bit photofit to me, as opposed to fit in photos, Jamie’s cousin Fat Frank nabbed the more alluring Eternal warbler, though that didn’t last and Easther went on to marry and divorce Shane from Boyzone, or so it says here in the Economist.

Posted about 1 year ago by Mockernee